FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 8, 2026
Justly Prudent sues Progressive over lowball uninsured motorist offer
Lawsuit alleges Progressive offered an Arlington driver just $7,800 initially on a $250,000 uninsured motorist policy after he was hit by an uninsured driver who ran a stop sign in clear daylight.

On May 8, 2026, Justly Prudent filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on behalf of a Virginia resident who says Progressive Universal Insurance Company is refusing to honor the very coverage he paid for to protect himself against uninsured drivers.
The story behind the lawsuit is one many drivers fear. On the afternoon of April 30, 2025, the plaintiff was driving home through the intersection of Clarendon Boulevard and North Quinn Street in Arlington. He was traveling at the posted speed limit. He was wearing his seatbelt. He had a green corridor through the intersection. According to the complaint, an uninsured driver in a 2021 Audi blew through the stop sign on North Quinn Street and slammed directly into his path. Both cars had to be towed from the scene.
The Arlington County Police Department's investigation was unambiguous. The officer on the scene attributed "No Improper Action" to the plaintiff and issued the at-fault driver a summons for failing to yield the right-of-way. The at-fault driver, the complaint alleges, carried no automobile liability insurance at all.
That is exactly the situation uninsured motorist coverage is designed to fix. The plaintiff had purchased an automobile policy from Progressive with $250,000 in uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage per person—the specific protection drivers buy precisely to guard against being hit by someone with no insurance. He paid every premium. The policy was in full force and effect on the day of the collision. By Progressive's own confirmation in writing on May 22, 2025, the at-fault driver was uninsured.
The collision left the plaintiff with traumatic injuries to his chest wall, rib cage, thoracic spine, and left forearm. Photographs taken at the scene document a prominent diagonal contusion across his chest from the seatbelt and open lacerations across his left forearm. He treated for roughly five months, including physician evaluations, diagnostic imaging, and 16 sessions of physical therapy and chiropractic care. Nearly a year later, the lacerations on his forearm remain visible as permanent scarring.
Despite clear liability, written confirmation that the at-fault driver was uninsured, and documented medical bills exceeding $5,200, the complaint alleges that Progressive initially offered just $7,800 to settle the claim—an amount that barely covers the plaintiff's out-of-pocket medical costs and fails to account for his pain, his permanent scarring, his projected future medical care, or the months he spent unable to lift, exercise, or sleep through the night without disruption.
The complaint asserts two counts. The first is a negligence claim against the at-fault driver, premised on his failure to yield the right-of-way under Virginia traffic law—a violation that Virginia courts treat as negligence per se, meaning the act of breaking the safety statute is itself proof of carelessness. The second is a breach of contract claim against Progressive under Virginia's uninsured motorist statute, alleging that Progressive failed to pay the benefits it promised in exchange for the premiums the plaintiff faithfully paid.
The case asks a simple question that resonates well beyond this one collision: when a driver does everything right—buys the coverage, pays the premiums, gets hit by someone with no insurance—does the insurance company actually deliver on the promise it sold?
"Uninsured motorist coverage exists for exactly this type of situation where a careful driver is hit by someone with no insurance, through no fault of his own," said Jordan D. Howlette, Managing Attorney of Justly Prudent. "Our client paid every premium and did everything right. He is entitled to the full benefit of the policy he bought, not a settlement offer that barely covers his medical bills."
The case is Matthew Gurniak v. Anique Ahmed, et al. (Case No. 1:26-cv-1234), filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division.
Justly Prudent is a law firm that provides comprehensive legal services across multiple practice areas, with particular aptitude in civil rights and constitutional tort litigation. While serving clients in matters ranging from complex commercial disputes to employment law, the firm maintains a steadfast commitment to advancing civil rights through impactful litigation against government misconduct and systemic constitutional violations. For more information, visit www.justlyprudent.com or call (202) 921-6080.

